In reply to: man, your opinions on Hendrix vary wildly  posted by jt

• my reading your posts? - jt  2013-03-08 12:33:51
  • I blame typing skills. My point on Hendrix in 2011 was that - SEE  2013-03-08 12:39:09
    • It was only a matter of time before you trotted out the 48% - garbageplate  2013-03-08 12:50:09
      • I didn't "trot it out", you make me sound like a hussy - SEE  2013-03-08 12:56:13
        • And I'm merely pointing out that your argument is facile * - garbageplate  2013-03-08 13:00:35
          • I thought the "Kelly botched the QB" argument was facile. - SEE  2013-03-08 13:06:24
            • The only thing more worthless than 48% completion - garbageplate  2013-03-08 13:07:43
              • Again, it isn't used to draw a conclusion I made - SEE  2013-03-08 13:10:38
                • Like I said, worthless - garbageplate  2013-03-08 13:12:47
                  • If that's true, then what is "worthy" and what "worthy" - SEE  2013-03-08 13:23:22
                    • I never said that Hendrix was a better option - jt  2013-03-08 14:32:25
                    • I don't know what goes through the minds of others - garbageplate  2013-03-08 13:25:13
                      • Perfect. So you didn't hold the opinion that Hendrix - SEE  2013-03-08 13:34:18
                        • No, I did not hold that opinion - garbageplate  2013-03-08 13:41:24
                          • I'll agree to disagree. "Not only is there too little - SEE  2013-03-08 13:44:29
    • past isn't future - jt  2013-03-08 12:46:16
      • I never said anything about 2012. So yes, I see - SEE  2013-03-08 12:53:51
        • so your opinion on Hendrix in 2011 - jt  2013-03-08 12:55:31
          • BTW, the things you think show incongruency - SEE  2013-03-08 17:47:30
          • It was to address the argument that "Kelly botched the QB - SEE  2013-03-08 13:02:50