In reply to: Does anyone think there was a realistic chance Kiel  posted by SEE

• Are you sure your reading my posts? - SEE  2013-03-08 12:32:39
  • my reading your posts? - jt  2013-03-08 12:33:51
    • I blame typing skills. My point on Hendrix in 2011 was that - SEE  2013-03-08 12:39:09
      • It was only a matter of time before you trotted out the 48% - garbageplate  2013-03-08 12:50:09
        • I didn't "trot it out", you make me sound like a hussy - SEE  2013-03-08 12:56:13
          • And I'm merely pointing out that your argument is facile * - garbageplate  2013-03-08 13:00:35
            • I thought the "Kelly botched the QB" argument was facile. - SEE  2013-03-08 13:06:24
              • The only thing more worthless than 48% completion - garbageplate  2013-03-08 13:07:43
                • Again, it isn't used to draw a conclusion I made - SEE  2013-03-08 13:10:38
                  • Like I said, worthless - garbageplate  2013-03-08 13:12:47
                    • If that's true, then what is "worthy" and what "worthy" - SEE  2013-03-08 13:23:22
                      • I never said that Hendrix was a better option - jt  2013-03-08 14:32:25
                      • I don't know what goes through the minds of others - garbageplate  2013-03-08 13:25:13
                        • Perfect. So you didn't hold the opinion that Hendrix - SEE  2013-03-08 13:34:18
                          • No, I did not hold that opinion - garbageplate  2013-03-08 13:41:24
                            • I'll agree to disagree. "Not only is there too little - SEE  2013-03-08 13:44:29
      • past isn't future - jt  2013-03-08 12:46:16
        • I never said anything about 2012. So yes, I see - SEE  2013-03-08 12:53:51
          • so your opinion on Hendrix in 2011 - jt  2013-03-08 12:55:31
            • BTW, the things you think show incongruency - SEE  2013-03-08 17:47:30
            • It was to address the argument that "Kelly botched the QB - SEE  2013-03-08 13:02:50