Kiel reportedly to transfer (link) (link)
by Irishdemon (2013-03-07 19:28:33)
Edited on 2013-03-07 19:29:43
[ cannot delete ]   [ Edit ]   [ Return to Rock's House ]   [ Show All Thread ]   [ Ignore Poster ]   [ Report Post ]   [ Highlight Poster ]   [ Reply ]

 






Have we ever had a quarterback transfer,
by The Oak  (2013-03-08 10:07:56)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

and end up being better than the one we kept? Or any position for that matter.

I am not saying that will happen here, but it certainly could.

I really liked the thought of Kiel being the backup this year.


Hmmm.. *
by karmel  (2013-03-09 00:22:14)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


Randy Wright, possibly. *
by NDMD89  (2013-03-08 10:43:47)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


Kustok, arguably *
by BillShakespeare  (2013-03-08 10:10:06)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


Who was our QB when Kent Graham transferred? *
by Mobster  (2013-03-08 10:24:14)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


Tony Rice *
by 1978Irish  (2013-03-08 10:25:54)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


Graham transferred because of Rice
by manor98  (2013-03-08 10:39:14)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Which you no doubt know, I'm not trying to correct you or anything. But if you want to draw some parallels... A slight-of-build, athletic quarterback from South Carolina was the presumptive starter in front of a heralded pro-style quarterback, who then transferred because he felt he couldn't get on the field. Hm.

Drawing parallels is really nothing more meaningful than a fan's diversion, though. As Counselor Cross will tell you, analogies tend to be very ineffective because it's far too easy to point out how the situations aren't analogous. Golson is a far better passer than Rice was, and Rice was a far better runner than Golson is. Both basically do/did one well well enough to keep defenses honest on the other, but their strengths are flipped. I believe Graham was well-regarded as a recruit but not at the comparative level of Kiel. I also doubt Kiel will end up at a program anywhere near as notable as Ohio State, where Graham landed (or Michigan, USC, Alabama, LSU, Oklahoma, etc.).

But there were definitely Irish fans gnashing their teeth about how the "central casting" QB transferred because the coach was too stubborn to unseat the smurf who fit his system. That worked out pretty well, though. (Note to Cross: I am not implying that Golson will now win the title next year. Just to be clear.) The backup QB is always the most popular guy on the team.


He was "slight of build"?
by ACross  (2013-03-08 11:04:08)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

My ass.


Rice was listed at 6'-0", 197 when he graduated
by ndroman21  (2013-03-08 11:11:03)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Golson was listed at 6'-0" 185 as a sophomore. He's 12 lbs lighter with 3 years to play.

Zaire is already listed near Rice's graduation height/weight.


and they're both African American *
by jt  (2013-03-08 11:51:43)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


Racist! *
by MDDomer  (2013-03-08 14:08:03)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


I think "running QB" is the term you're looking for.
by ndroman21  (2013-03-08 12:01:47)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Seriously, though, I'm not saying Golson is Rice. He's not. I'm saying that Across impression of Rice as a monster and Golson as a shrimp is not necessarily supported by their listed statistics.


They remind me of an African American Ed McCaffrey. *
by geoffgeoffers  (2013-03-09 08:29:00)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


a true athlete as opposed to a student of the game *
by jt  (2013-03-08 12:25:16)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


I've seen both up close
by Jvan  (2013-03-08 12:04:18)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

They are not very similar and Tony is a taller/bigger guy by a distinct margin.


Is Golson really closer to 5'-9" than 6'-0" ?
by ndroman21  (2013-03-08 12:06:15)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

I certainly thought he looked bulkier last year than he did coming in.


Hard to tell
by Jvan  (2013-03-08 12:11:29)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

He was wearing these:



I think they were a gift from Andy. Hope it wasn't an NCAA violation.


Rice was built like a brick shithouse. Giant thighs. Broad
by ACross  (2013-03-08 11:16:15)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

shoulders. Strong as an ox.

Golson is 185 like Cash is 185.


But Cash might have a better arm *
by pmcdnd96  (2013-03-08 11:59:46)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


Might? Cash can hit the cross bar from 70. Bank it. *
by cj  (2013-03-08 19:12:54)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


I've never met Golson or Cash, regrettably.
by ndroman21  (2013-03-08 11:31:52)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

However, if Rice wasn't a shrimp by your definition, it seems that Zaire is probably not, either.

Golson still has some work to do in the weight room.


I think he had visions of being ND's Mr. Football, and
by BAC69  (2013-03-08 10:03:46)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

now he has calculated that he won't be given a chance unless Golson is hurt or fails big-time come the fall. If none of this happens, he doesn't want to ride the bench and waste his talent behind Golson. I see the nightmare of Matt LoVecchio leaving and Dillingham being the no. 2 QB with Carlyle Holiday in the role of Golson; I swear, it is almost like 2002 all over again.

Really, I don't blame him any more than I blamed LoVeccio. If Kiel is good, which none of us really know, it would be a waste. The clock is ticking on his eligibility, so if I were him, I'd leave too. He can probably go a lot of places where he can step right in to the QB slot, or at least will be given a chance to show what he can do--apparently something he doesn't see happening at ND, at least not in a real game.

It is absolutely critical that ND get consistently better QB play all season--not just a few games--if 2013 is to be as good or better than 2012. This transfer can only create a bad situation for ND's team. With the transfer, an extra 10 pounds of responsibility and criticality will be put on Golson's shoulders. Rees is a nice guy, but it doesn't give me high hopes of a stellar season in 2013 if he is the best we have as a no. 2 QB. Kelly has to know this too, and it will mean that he will continue to be protective of Golson's health, i.e. he won't let him run very much. So I see us stuck in a rut--where Golson is protected for fear that Rees might have to play. I think 2013 could very well be a groundhog day repeat of 2012, if that good.

As far as I know Kiel hasn't left yet, so maybe Kelly can promise him a chance to play and keep him for another year. Here's hoping so.


Interesting anecdote about Bernie Kosar and transfering
by 2020  (2013-03-08 11:03:40)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

... He was the weakest kid on the team. He was mortified when his statuesque competition, Vinny Testaverde, walked onto campus and bench-pressed 325 pounds a bunch of times. Kosar got 185 up just once, with arms shaking. So he went to coach Howard Schnellenberger and, sweating and trying not to tremble, told him he was going to transfer. And now he quotes the old pipe-smoking coach and applies those lessons from nearly three decades ago to today: "Son, I'm not going to lie. It doesn't look good for you. But wherever you go in life, there's competition. The guys who run home to mommy tend to be quitters their whole life."

Kosar won. Won huge. Won the job and the national championship in a flabbergasting upset of Nebraska to begin Miami's unprecedented football run through the next two decades.


Is QB the highest transfer rate position since Davie
by choanser  (2013-03-08 09:50:10)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Off the top of my head:

Christian Olson
Lovechio
Zac Kustok
Demetrius Jones
Dayne Crist (sort of)
The guy who ended up at UConn?
It seems like there are a few more that I am forgetting


Hansen article says 8 have transferred since Holtz
by frickerdog  (2013-03-08 09:53:52)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Also, 4 have switched positions, including Massa on the current team.


8 out of 16, one every 1.7 years
by manor98  (2013-03-08 10:49:42)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

And I think that was just scholarship QB's, so he wasn't counting Montana. It's a position that invites a high rate of attrition, but even at that it seems a little excessive. Hopefully we'll get a little stability there going forward, although I expect we'd still see someone transfer every 2 or 3 years.


It's kind of odd that he might be transferring before spring
by smcchick  (2013-03-08 09:32:28)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

practice. Unless he is able to get into a school that is on a quarter system, I can't see a reason to sit out the spring and not get reps at any school.


If his plan is to transfer but wait until after spring...
by localirishfan  (2013-03-08 11:47:33)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

...practice, I would not be giving him any reps, but that is just me. I would save the reps for the guys who are staying.


I meant that if I were Gunner, I would just wait until after
by smcchick  (2013-03-08 13:54:56)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

spring practice to declare I was transferring. He might as well see how the spring plays out.


This type of thing is inevitable with top QBs. Look at the
by Raoul  (2013-03-08 09:16:54)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

USC situation. Max Browne probably thought he had a clear shot to beat out whatever was there in the Spring and Fall and now there is a risk that Wittek will beat him out and at least have a chance to win the job while Browne is extremely green. If that happens then Browne is looking at a long wait whereas he may have thought he had a clear shot at starting all foru years.

Things are unpredictable and can't be controlled.


I don't know why this is a surprise
by dulac89  (2013-03-08 09:00:01)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Whenever a player makes a last minute decision to stay close to home as much to appease family as any other reason, it stands to reason that as they develop a little more independence they'll question that decision.

I don't think Kiel's heart was ever set on attending ND, and now that he's had a chance to develop a little bit of a break from Mom and Dad he's better able to make these decisions.

Combine this with the very real possibility of 2-3 more years of backup duty and you can see why he'd transfer.


What leads you to believe that independence
by Spunkmeier  (2013-03-08 09:06:06)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

from his family has anything at all to do with this? Did I miss something?


It's speculation, but isn't this entire thread?
by dulac89  (2013-03-08 10:24:12)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

By all reports he essentially succumbed to family pressure to stay close to home and play for ND. I'm sure a high school student living at home with your parents is far more likely to make decisions that would appease his parents than someone who has now lived away from home for a year.

My primary point is that the decision to attend ND appeared more of a family decision than his decision.


Agreed that it is speculative.
by Spunkmeier  (2013-03-08 11:51:00)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Also agree that it looked to be a family decision last year, but as to which family member (son vs parents) seems unclear. How far away from home his next destination is may be informative, although it's still just another tea leaf for us, I suppose. Seems like a good close knit family. I wish him well.


I can't blame him...
by Irishlord  (2013-03-08 08:17:31)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

He has a dream and it appears it would likely remain unfulfilled if he remained at ND. It would be nice if we could hoard talent but sometimes that is unfair to the athletes.


Hope the kid finds his niche; he's on his fourth school now
by korzo78  (2013-03-08 07:55:14)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Started out at as an IU commit, then LSU, switched to ND, and now ??? Maybe fourth time is a charm?

ND should be OK in 2013 -- although, I would prefer having someone more athletic than Rees at the backup.

Staff now needs to put more emphasis on getting another QB in the upcoming class.

QB is the toughest position to recruit. Coaches must have fits. You need depth but kids don't want to sit and wait. You usually recruit only one player per year. A player leaves and your depth goes down the toilet. Oy vey.



Might mean a JuCo considering the timing.
by Rudy36  (2013-03-08 07:49:31)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Gives him a spring to learn offensive system, highlight his skills for a year, transfer again in January to a Div I school and play immediately.


We'll see how this all plays out. But it should be no
by 84david  (2013-03-08 07:48:18)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

surprise that a 5* QB is making a business decision. I doubt that
he wanted to be the 4th string QB.

I hope he does well wherever he goes


Beaten like the proverbial red haired stepchild.
by ProV1x  (2013-03-08 07:17:31)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

I hate to see this but it looks like he's at the right place at the wrong time. I believe most would like to watch him challenge EG head to head but if he leaves immediately I'd like to see him go back to IU.


Another vagabond QB from Indiana?
by Domer58  (2013-03-08 07:09:36)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Does the name George ring any bells?

Beginning to sound like a rerun.

Do wish Blair would do spring practice and finish the semester - anything could happen.

Rush to judgement?


Don't know about vagabonds. Pretty interesting list of QBs.
by McSweeney  (2013-03-08 08:23:23)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Gunner Kiel, Tre Roberson, Morgan Newton, James Banks, Clayton Richard, Jay Cutler, Rex Grossman, Rick Mirer, Jeff George.

You got some studs in there. Heck, Clayton Richard is an elite MLB left-handed pitcher.


Decent. Not elite. He's 44-42 with a career 4.13 ERA
by sprack  (2013-03-08 10:58:39)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

And that's in the best pitcher's park in baseball.


Elite? No. *
by Patrick Bateman  (2013-03-08 09:42:22)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


You do realize Blair is dead right?? *
by die4irish  (2013-03-08 07:40:30)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


And even worse, out of eligibility. *
by SouthSideIrish  (2013-03-08 11:16:18)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


Diet Coke just shot out of my nose. *
by PWK2  (2013-03-08 12:32:47)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


Not from Indiana, but you remember Geo. Izo, don't you?
by ProV1x  (2013-03-08 07:23:15)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

George is tied for the longest TD pass in NFL history, 99 yards to Bobby Mitchell while with the Skins.


So much for the pipeline. Suddenly Hendrix and maybe
by SEE  (2013-03-08 05:27:03)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Massa become 5th year possibilities for 2014. The "anybody but Rees " crowd may miss him when he's gone. Time to fire up the Zaire highlights.

Couple of quotes from the Elite 11:

"He has a very live arm, and made some big throws down the field. He showed off an effortless release and spun the ball very well in what was far from ideal conditions."

"I was very impressed with his combination of athleticism and arm strength. Zaire certainly isn’t the biggest quarterback at the star-studded camp, but he was slinging the ball all over the field with good velocity and accuracy."




Keil's leaving may have more to do w/ Zaire than Golson *
by Phlsphr  (2013-03-08 11:35:45)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


I blame SEE's Golson highlight post below. * *
by NDMike2001  (2013-03-08 04:47:51)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


Supposedly his possible landing spots include
by manor98  (2013-03-07 23:43:25)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Ball State, Miami (Ohio), Northern Illinois and Cincinnati. The list speaks for itself, I guess, although I can see how a lot of big-school coaches would be wary of a signing-day decommit who then transferred. Bruce Feldman tweeted that a major AQ coach told him he declined Kiel's interest lately, although without the context provided by actually knowing the coach and school that doesn't mean much.

Very disappointing. I had hoped he'd give it a shot in spring ball to see if he could push Golson, but apparently either playing now or having a clearer path in front of him is his priority. Which is OK, it's his prerogative. Just would've been nice to see what he could do. On the other hand, our program may be at the point where we lose 5-star talent on a semi-regular basis because of a lack of playing time (Lynch and now Kiel). That's a good problem to have, although of course we need to see a stronger correlation to an upward program trend on the field before I'll have more confidence in that being the situation.

Damn. Golson, Rees, Hendrix next year (assuming they'll try everything they can do to redshirt Zaire, who probably isn't physically ready). If the staff knew this was coming, it might explain why they have a lot of interest in another elite QB in the 2014 class, Brandon Dawkins, rather than a position-filler.


Yes, but we didn't lose Lynch due to lack of playing time
by chezhdchick  (2013-03-08 09:56:26)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

He got more PT than most freshman and was set to be a main player on defense as a sophomore. Lynch's issue was geography. South Bend wasn't in Florida.

Keil is a matter of playing time. He's behind a guy with three more years eligibility, and no matter how well he does, it would be hard to jusify benching a kid who lead you to a 12-0 season and a BCS championship game appearance. And there's Malik Zaire right behind him. Gunner wants to play, and for more than just one year, I would assume. He didn't seem unhappy at ND, like Lynch was.

This seems more like a Zach Frazer situation, than an Aaron Lynch (or Demetrius Jones).

I'm not surprised. I am surprised that the list of possible destination schools are not bigger programs. And they ARE close to his home, so maybe he's still not ready to be too far away from the family.


You and jt make a valid point on Lynch
by manor98  (2013-03-08 10:46:45)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

I didn't think through my wording on that too well. Kiel and Lynch definitely aren't fully similar situations; obviously there's at least one common thread, that both decided ND wasn't the best place for them, but beyond that they're pretty different. I think in a sense playing time may have been involved with Lynch, but more as the symptom than the problem. He couldn't play nice in the sandbox, and I think he didn't put too much into learning his play responsibilities on the field (from what I've read, there are hints that he was not the most coachable guy). The staff may have made it clear that if he didn't clean up his act he wasn't going to be a three-down player, which added to distance/weather/baby/etc. led him to leave. But like I said, PT there is the symptom and not the issue.

While it's very early in the Kiel saga here, this looks like a much more cut and dried case of playing time as the simple cause. In any case, whatever was behind their decisions they're just two isolated data points right now. So I'm not ready to say our program is at a place where elite talent transfers because it can't see the field for one reason or another, but we may be headed there.


In the year he sits out someone could lock up the job. If he
by Raoul  (2013-03-08 01:13:15)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

really wants to be certain he will be the starter he should transfer to I-AA, like Delaware, where I believe he would have no period to sit out.


The cradle of Super Bowl quarterbacks
by manor98  (2013-03-08 09:26:17)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Flacco, notably, but also Rich Gannon. Of course Flacco fared a bit better, but then his coach wasn't sabotaging the entire team to get back at the owner. Or something like that.


Possibly Tennessee *
by crazymary  (2013-03-08 00:14:14)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


RS Freshman QB Peterman has a year to lock up the job and so
by Raoul  (2013-03-08 01:19:29)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Kiel could easily get Golson'ed if Peterman performs in fall 2013. And Peterman is his year in school.


I don't think Lynch transferred due to playing time
by jt  (2013-03-07 23:46:19)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

don't disagree with anything else you say, however.


Depends on what you mean by playing time. *
by baloo88  (2013-03-08 05:29:39)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


isn't Zaire supposed to be
by chsfb75  (2013-03-07 22:32:44)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

As good or better than Golson?


Prospects all sound great
by BmoreIrish  (2013-03-08 07:57:12)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

The 4 and 5 stars are all highly talented. The 3 stars are all "sleepers". I'm not saying Zaire can't be better than Golson, but I would say that judgment can certainly not be made by comparing HS resumes. Only when they actually play do you get to see the flaws. Golson has set what his floor will be, and it's pretty good. My main fear with him, as others have stated, is his ability to withstand injury.


No. *
by OhioIrish21  (2013-03-08 00:33:49)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


that just cannot be true
by jt  (2013-03-07 22:36:01)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Golson was/is a combination of Charlie Ward/Randall Cunningham/Russell Wilson and all other great African American qbs through the years (smaller/younger Warren Moon). Zaire cannot be that good, can he?

Now, being serious for a moment, I am sure he is a good player and a good prospect otherwise ND wouldn't have recruited him. That said, I would doubt that he'll be ready to take meaningful snaps in a full version of this offense anytime soon.


What? I read Golson is a shrimp with a weak arm...
by ndroman21  (2013-03-08 08:06:38)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

...who could never hope to see any receiver between the hash marks, much less get him the ball, considering he doesn't even use the laces.


Puzzling
by 2ndstreeter  (2013-03-07 22:29:44)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

It seemed like he had the reported skills and confidence to challenge Golson this year. Hope he reconsiders.


I actually thought Kiel was going to play a lot in the fall
by Groundhog  (2013-03-07 23:55:01)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Not quite a two-headed QB system like Kelly had a Cincinnati, but fairly close.


My thought also. *
by manor98  (2013-03-08 10:30:53)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


If he was not getting signals that he has a legit shot at #2
by 1NDGal  (2013-03-07 22:24:00)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

because Rees is #2, then I'm mad.

Rees, you served your school, thank you, but bye. We must focus on the future. I have a hard time believing that Kiel would not beat Rees for arm strength and accuracy in April.

Kiel was a huge get, goofy as his commitment process was. If he's a sham, then oh well. But if he was squelched out of loyalty to Rees, that's a program-inhibiting move.

Rees is not the guy. He had more than a fair shot of proving he is. The team must move on.


Oh come on. Rees has one more year
by sprack  (2013-03-08 10:02:33)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Kiel wants to start. The issue is sitting behind Golson, not Rees.


What signals might those be???
by BigCLumber  (2013-03-07 23:31:46)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

It's not even spring ball yet, for crying out loud. Do you really think that Kelly wasn't going to give him a fair shot to be the backup QB next season?


look, I think we need to add some perspective here
by jt  (2013-03-07 22:32:23)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Kiel was a big signing but his recruiting process lends some clues as to some potential issues.

If he didn't even want to compete for the starting spot and/or top backup and wouldn't even go through spring practice I have a hard time finding fault with anything Rees or Kelly did or didn't do.

This doesn't mean that it doesn't suck, because it does. But Rees has been a good soldier and deserves a bit more than "thank you but bye." Now, maybe he even deserves better than what I said below (something along the lines of "I hope he never plays except in a blowout"). That said, he certainly deserves a hell of a lot more than a kid that wasn't even willing to stick it out and compete.


I'd suggest waiting to hear Kiel's side of the story *
by ACross  (2013-03-07 23:13:50)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


I'm sure to Kiel it's a business decision
by Jvan  (2013-03-07 22:57:44)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

If he is as talented as advertised, and, more importantly, as talented as he apparently believes he is, Kiel will want an opportuity to play more than one season of college ball. NFL teams typically place a higher value on multi-year starters due to the wealth of game experience, as I'm sure you know. Sitting behind Golson who has three years of eligibility left may be something he does not want to risk. If Kiel doesn't leave now, the strategy of starting over somewhere else pays him diminishing returns going forward.


Full marks for JVAN. This is all about life after college
by irishrower  (2013-03-08 09:35:31)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

When he signed I thought it was great...but I always wondered why he didn't sign at IU where he'd be the big dog right away and could plan an early exit.


there's "now" and then there's "three months from now"
by jt  (2013-03-07 23:29:08)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

"now" indicates a lack of desire to compete and "three months from now" indicates what you observe.


What Andy said *
by Jvan  (2013-03-08 00:07:57)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


Perhaps he doesn't like what he's been told
by ACross  (2013-03-08 00:07:40)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Who knows.


okay, that is fair
by jt  (2013-03-08 00:09:40)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

but I would imagine that "what he has been told" has more to do with Zaire and Golson and little (if anything) to do with Rees.


I was thinking more like
by ACross  (2013-03-08 00:19:45)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Hey coach, is the QB position open for competition? If I prove I' m better, can I win the job?

No.


I'd suggest waiting to hear Kelly's side of the story *
by Domer99  (2013-03-08 13:13:19)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


No coach in his right mind would answer "no" *
by Phlsphr  (2013-03-08 11:42:51)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


Kelly's comments seem to imply the opposite
by manor98  (2013-03-08 09:38:01)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

These quotes are from a discussion with Eric Hansen before Kiel told Kelly he was transferring, in response to a question about Kiel-to-transfer rumors (EDIT: added a link to the article). Yes, sure, words are just words, but aside from Tommy Rees last year, given Kelly's history of having a quick hook for QB's if he's unsatisified with their performance makes me inclined to believe him. To be clear, if Kiel wants immediate playing time I don't have a problem with him transferring, and I also don't have a problem with what Kelly says below.

"It will all shake itself out this spring," he said. "And I say that because (Kiel) really hasn't been given an opportunity. He came in as an early enrollee and had the spring to just run around there with very little knowledge base of the college game and understanding protections. He just did things because he's a big, strong athlete.

"We gave him a little bit of a sniff of it in preseason camp, but not a lot really, quite frankly, because again there was a learning curve there and we needed to hit the ground running. So this spring is going to be, quite frankly, his opportunity to show himself.

"So he may transfer at the end of spring, He may be the starter at the end of spring. I think the question is fair, but I really couldn't tell you how to answer those questions other than this spring will definitely determine his place within the program."

...

Kelly talked Thursday about his philosophy of competition among QBs when asked how he manages egos and expectations, giving the revolving door at the position before his arrival.

"I don't know what happened before we got here," he said. "I know what I laid down within the program about expectations and the parameters for all positions, not just quarterback -- left tackle, guard. And I'm going to recruit somebody to beat you out. And they know that coming in.

"So if you're a quarterback and you don't think I'm going to bring in Malik Zaire to beat you out, then you need to transfer. I do it in the right way. I'm not saying it's a callous, cold way of doing it, but my job is to continue to bring in the best fits for Notre Dame, both on and off the field. So if you're a bit uneasy about the situation, then I welcome your transfer.

"I've done it since I've been at Grand Valley (State) that way -- try to continue that competition within the ranks, because the guys that crack are the ones you want to crack.
[EDIT #2: I think it's worth noting here that Kelly said this before Kiel told him the news - it's not a petulant response to the transfer, but a straight statement of his philosophy.] I can tell you if the program's humming and it's doing it the right way, you're going to have some transfers, because you're building competition within the ranks. And it's always going to be that way."


I'd bet the opposite conversation took place.
by NDMike2001  (2013-03-08 05:17:25)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

"Hey coach, enough of the open competition BS. Am I going to get a chance to show my stuff against Golson or will I have to share snaps with guys like Hendrix and Zaire?"

"Open competition."

I can't say that I blame Kiel. At quarterback playing time is paramount. Sure, Kelly can say that the best player will play. However, experience is a big part of that evaluation. It was doubtful that Kiel was going to beat out Golson. Tommy is the perfect fill-in guy. That leaves Kiel hoping for Golson to have a significant injury. That's a tough way to remain positive.


experience is such a big part of the evaluation
by El Capitan  (2013-03-08 08:06:42)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

That Kelly adamantly started a brand new starter over a guy with 16 games of starting experience., granted the incumbent was suspended for the first game.


I wonder what the pecking order was heading into spring
by SEE  (2013-03-08 06:13:47)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Golson, Rees, Hendrix, Kiel, Zaire?

"Redshirt sophomore Andrew Hendrix was ahead of Kiel on the depth chart last year as well, and Notre Dame welcomed in another quarterback this semester in early enrollee Malik Zaire."


Wasn't. Kiel being redshirted last year?
by ACross  (2013-03-08 07:28:25)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

If so, that quote was nonsense.


Was he redshirted because he was behind Hendrix?
by SEE  (2013-03-08 11:13:28)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

I the answer's no, then the quote is nonsense.


Yes he was *
by MDDomer  (2013-03-08 10:33:51)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


asked and answered
by vivaflanner  (2013-03-08 02:02:24)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

From Eric Hansen article

"It will all shake itself out this spring," he (KELLY) said. "And I say that because (Kiel) really hasn't been given an opportunity. He came in as an early enrollee and had the spring to just run around there with very little knowledge base of the college game and understanding protections. He just did things because he's a big, strong athlete.

"We gave him a little bit of a sniff of it in preseason camp, but not a lot really, quite frankly, because again there was a learning curve there and we needed to hit the ground running. So this spring is going to be, quite frankly, his opportunity to show himself.

"So he may transfer at the end of spring, He may be the starter at the end of spring. I think the question is fair, but I really couldn't tell you how to answer those questions other than this spring will definitely determine his place within the program."

Of course, this doesn't mean he said the same thing to Kiel. But the scenario you posit above is pretty unlikely. Kiel may have felt he had no chance to win, for whatever reason.


Baseless speculation, nice.
by forrestgump  (2013-03-08 00:50:56)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

You honestly believe any coach would say that? Jesus, you will stop at nothing to further your agenda.


Kelly is always trying to screw 5 star QBs isn't he? *
by irishaddict  (2013-03-08 00:23:41)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


How can he screw a player he can't recruit?
by SEE  (2013-03-08 06:30:26)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Jack Handy would be proud.


Good grief *
by Jvan  (2013-03-08 00:36:08)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


he racialist against tall white dudes *
by jt  (2013-03-08 00:29:33)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


okay, that is also fair reason to look elsewhere
by jt  (2013-03-08 00:23:30)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

however, the initial post I responded to in this thread was about Rees, not about that type of comment.

I doubt Rees is favored to win the starting job right now.


I'll be interested to see the market for Kiel *
by El Capitan  (2013-03-07 23:00:27)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


Tommy was such a non-factor in 2012 *
by El Capitan  (2013-03-07 22:27:25)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


Well
by 2ndstreeter  (2013-03-07 22:38:39)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

I don't disagree with your implied assessment of his valuable spot performances under pressure last season, but he's not able to sustain that level consistently. He's clearly not the future and the point is well taken that if Kiel is as good as advertised Rees should be taking a back seat to him.


there's truth to that
by El Capitan  (2013-03-07 23:01:38)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

At the same time that spot needs to be earned and it's a shame that Kiel didn't want to compete for it.


What does this mean for the Red Army? *
by ND44  (2013-03-07 22:21:32)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


Chest problems? *
by BacTien  (2013-03-07 21:56:26)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


Well.........Bye (link)
by alleghenyirish  (2013-03-07 21:47:08)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


It's a good thing Golson won't ever get hurt
by Jvan  (2013-03-07 21:20:56)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Otherwise, we'd be fooked.


Rees did lead the team to four wins last year. * *
by Irishdemon  (2013-03-07 21:45:43)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


Most forget about this..Mr no-talent helped save our 12-0 yr *
by Caber  (2013-03-07 22:01:28)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


Yeah, I'd rather not keep playing russian roulette.
by Papa November  (2013-03-07 23:02:41)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

At some point, it's going to land on the wrong chamber.


I'm grateful for all that Rees has done for the program
by jt  (2013-03-07 22:19:33)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

that said, I hope he never has to play again unless it's in a major blowout.


That's the benefit of being a big, pocket passer. *
by NDMike2001  (2013-03-07 21:24:45)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


This may not be a popular opinion
by Bmoreirish  (2013-03-07 21:13:53)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

But honestly having talented players transfer from the program because - and this is an educated guess - he is blocked by other talented players is a sign of becoming a good program. It happens and I wish him well.


This is probably more true at QB than any other position.
by Tex Francisco  (2013-03-07 21:19:59)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

At virtually every other position, there are enough snaps to keep a talented second stringer happy and engaged, but that's just not the nature of the QB position.


Bad timing for TSN
by tb-sb  (2013-03-07 20:41:56)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

This article will have to be revised


Someone hide the scissors from ACross
by JClarke  (2013-03-07 20:21:41)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

-all joking aside, why now? Why not after Spring Ball? I can't imagine Kelly has given anything to Golson at least verbally. Oh well.


He probably wants to transfer so he can get spring ball
by ndkid5  (2013-03-07 21:27:11)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

at his new school. He'll still have to sit out another year though.


Where did the idea come from that he's transferring
by Rosecrea  (2013-03-08 08:23:29)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

today or before spring ball? The way more likely scenario is that he will finish the semester and then transfer.


is that even possible?
by jt  (2013-03-07 23:41:36)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

a mid semester transfer, that is.

Perhaps if he transfers to a school on the quarter system.


I think that this really sucks. I wish he would have stayed
by fasted68  (2013-03-07 20:19:32)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

for spring practice. He probably realizes that Kelly is stuck on Golson. Too bad. I see another seasson with games like last year only we don't win 12.


The backup QB is always the best player on the team.
by Tex Francisco  (2013-03-07 20:26:53)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

I simply don't get your "too bad" attitude. It boggles my mind how people could watch Golson last year as a first year starter and not be absolutely giddy about the next 2-3 years.


I hope I am wrong but I think that Golson has reached
by fasted68  (2013-03-08 06:33:50)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

his peak. If Kelly lets him run more then maybe not.


Kiel must disagree. *
by ndroman21  (2013-03-08 11:13:42)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


After one season? Good grief get a grip. *
by thersh  (2013-03-08 09:06:02)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


Giddy? c'mon the guy displayed plenty of flaws; he saved
by Marble Rye  (2013-03-08 00:43:31)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

our bacon against Pitt but he had plenty of crappy decisions and plays in several other games. If the Kiel kid is anywhere close to his hype he should have had a decent shot of overtaking Golson. Kiel's departure is a puzzling development to me. And thus far, I haven't been wowed by Kelly's qb development performance.


I'm not down on Golson
by jt  (2013-03-07 20:33:16)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

I'm down on his backups and our lack of depth


The FR now has to play this year so we have a #2 in 2014
by btd  (2013-03-07 21:52:30)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

This would be a total disaster if we didn't have Rees to at least give us a ray of hope if Golson goes down. It would be like only having Pat Dillingham otherwise.

I think Kelly now has to change strategies with the FR QB and he has to get him into games this year because Rees is gone in 2014 and we can't go into that year with our #2 never having seen the field.

I can't say I am shocked by the transfer. I really couldn't get my mind wrapped around him staying once it became clear Golson was above average and has 3 more years left. It is hard to tell a 5 star he has to hope the starter gets injured to have any real hope of playing more than 1 year.


Golson has 3 years of eligibility left, Kiel 4, Zaire 5.
by ndroman21  (2013-03-08 11:07:07)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Theres a big difference between the chance to play for 1 year or 2 years if you're unable to supplant the starter.

As long as we recruit a highly ranked QB every year (and we should absolutely do so) transfers are going to be a reality.


Uh, nobody gets 5 years of eligibility without a medical RS. *
by coalcracker  (2013-03-08 14:10:59)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


Fine, he has 5 years to exhaust his eligibility. *
by ndroman21  (2013-03-08 16:52:58)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


We had a #1 in 2012 that never played a snap before.
by Queensman  (2013-03-08 01:18:09)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

That turned out OK.

You also seem to forget Hendrix is still here. I think having Hendrix as a #3 is pretty good alternative. Certainly not even in the same stratosphere as Dillingham. If by some chance all three QB's go down, then you burn the year of eligibility with a highly talented and highly ranked freshman.

I think we'll survive redshirting Zaire in 2013 with the roster we have. I also highly doubt any college or pro team in the country could survive a season in which 3 QB's are lost to injury.


Hendrix will be gone
by Btd  (2013-03-09 05:18:16)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

It makes no sense for him to stay a 5th year versus going to med school. The odds are very low he will come back given his intended career path. If he plays a 5th year it will be via transfer where he thinks he has over 50% chance of starting and at a school where it may allow him to go to med school like IU.


Ah, it must be getting close to spring ball
by IrishLep  (2013-03-07 20:16:54)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

It seems that there is at least 1 transfer each spring. May as well get it out of the way early. Now, QB recruiting has suddenly become a bit more of a need in 2014


i doubt kiel is the last transfer before the summer
by SayItOutLoud  (2013-03-07 22:16:59)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

hard to believe we'll hang onto all nine scholarship safeties.


I LIKE it!!! *
by md1997  (2013-03-07 22:55:50)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


This puts Kelly in an interesting spot with Zaire.
by Tex Francisco  (2013-03-07 19:46:59)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

With Golson having three years remaining and Rees being a very competent backup, I think it makes the most sense to preserve a year of eligibility for Zaire. I assume this is what Kelly will do. It does, however, put us in a precarious spot for 2014. Our backup QB will have never taken a D1 snap. Of course, heading into this year our starter had never taken a D1 snap, and it wasn't a complete disaster.


They should NOT redshirt Zaire, IMO.
by bleedsgreen04  (2013-03-07 21:45:48)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

I think it was a mistake to redshirt Kiel, especially after we had Zaire committed. Unless the staff comes up completely empty on QB for the next recruiting cycle, Zaire should be getting some quality minutes in garbage time (hopefully we have plenty this next season). Even if the next class is bereft of a quarterback, I still think he should get some time out there.

I can't help but wonder if leaving Kiek home on most of these trips really turned him off on ever getting playing time.


Rees very competent backup - Oh boy.... *
by IrishFanIndy2003  (2013-03-07 21:40:02)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


Sucks, but I'm really not too bothered by it.
by irishboy89  (2013-03-07 19:45:54)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

I think we have a very solid QB for the next three years. It would have been extremely difficult for Kiel to win the spot from Golson, IMO. I bet Gunner realizes this, and doesn't want to wait for three more years to get on the field.

Transfers always suck, but when they happen because of a depth chart issue, it's hard to get too upset.


As of right now, we have only two scholarship QB's in 2014 *
by WilfordBrimley  (2013-03-07 20:02:01)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


we need to get one in this (and every) class
by jt  (2013-03-07 20:03:53)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

and we'll be in all right shape in 2014:

- one guy with 2 years left
- one guy with (hopefully) 4 years left
- one guy with at least 4 and possibly 5 years left

will Hendrix be eligible for a 5th year if he wants it?


I think Kelly agrees with this philosophy
by NavyJoe  (2013-03-08 09:45:45)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

We were already recruiting a few elite QBs in next year's recruiting class before this news came out.


I concur. A QB needs to be signed every year *
by IrishLep  (2013-03-07 20:21:21)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


And possible transfers like this are a reason why.
by bandfather  (2013-03-07 20:16:14)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Of course, the taking of one QB each year may also be a cause of possible transfers, but this is what needs to be done.


If I remember correctly, he is,
by WilfordBrimley  (2013-03-07 20:07:46)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

but I don't know if we'd take him or if he'd even want it...doesn't he want to go to medical school?


Last I heard re: Hendrix
by 59075  (2013-03-08 00:40:41)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

was that he is still on track for medical school after four years at ND. That said, if he could start one season as QB at ND, I'd bet he would delay medical school for a year.


I don't think we're "solid" from a depth perspective
by jt  (2013-03-07 19:54:02)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

and this again means that the handcuffs will be on the offense because if Golson gets hurt we're in deep trouble.

Also, iron sharpens iron and I would prefer to have quality depth to push Golson but that is very unlikely.


Golson going down would destroy the season.
by Papa November  (2013-03-07 20:54:40)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

And as you point out, even in a best case scenario, Kelly won't be comfortable with the full run package using Golson.


Groundhog Day. We seem to always only have 1 QB
by btd  (2013-03-07 21:46:10)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

The only bright side is Rees is not a total disaster, but we all know that if he has to play multiple games next year that we are not going back to the title game.

Losing Kiel is a major deal. Thank God at least the new guy starts this spring so he will at least know his name by fall. He likely has to play some snaps this year now, because we can't go into the following year with Rees gone and the #2 having never seen the field.


I purposely worded my comment so as to not imply that
by irishboy89  (2013-03-07 20:10:53)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

we have good QB depth. This year, we'll be fine with the most experienced back up in the nation behind Golson. Next year, we'll just need Zaire (or another recruit) to be ready if something happens to Everett.


the most experienced backup in the nation
by jt  (2013-03-07 20:14:05)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

(which I assume is true) isn't the same type of qb as our starter and that is problematic. He's also prone to turnovers, and that is problematic.

This is not a good thing and we're not in a good situation with depth. We're not "fine" we're "adequate at best" and we're praying that Golson progresses and doesn't get hurt.


Let's agree to disagree on this.
by irishboy89  (2013-03-08 01:13:27)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

I think we're still solid at QB. That being said, I'll join you in the prayers for Everett's health.


don't worry, Kelly has told everyone he can "manufacture"
by MrE  (2013-03-07 20:01:46)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

offense. So no need for a 5-star passing QB.


Thanks. I forgot how good the O was last year. *
by fasted68  (2013-03-07 20:21:33)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


we hung 50 on Navy and probably could have had more *
by MrE  (2013-03-07 20:30:34)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


Yeah, I'm sure Golson will stay healthy the entire season. *
by Finn_MacCool  (2013-03-07 19:52:59)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


Oof. *
by Irishted  (2013-03-07 19:32:33)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


So I guess Rees remains the backup
by bobnd80  (2013-03-07 19:29:42)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Would have anyway IMO.


What about the Montana kid?
by Rosecrea  (2013-03-07 19:56:07)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

That's a joke.


The contents of this post represent the views of the author. NDNation.com is not responsible for its contents.