what percentage of our passes were less than zero yards?
by
ACross
(2013-02-28 22:13:06)
[
cannot delete
] [
Edit
] [
Return to Rock's House
] [
Show All Thread
] [
Ignore Poster
] [
Report Post
] [
Highlight Poster
] [
Reply
]
In reply to:
Except that's not what shows in this study re Kelly.
posted by Mr Wednesday
How about less than 5?
And do these stats track the actual"distance in air" or is it distance in air plus whatever our receivers can run after they catch it?
I posit that we had a high number of passes behind the line, plus passes on the sideline 10 yards or less.
Our passing game was less than explosive.
Replies:
What was wrong? *
-
ACross
2013-03-01 09:03:36
The statement that...
-
Mr Wednesday
2013-03-01 10:39:23
What percentage of our passes were behind the line?
-
ACross
2013-03-01 10:42:00
Previously posted in this thread. (link)
-
Mr Wednesday
2013-03-01 10:54:18
It's okay to be wrong sometimes. (Your posit is dead wrong) *
-
LaughingTulkas
2013-03-01 08:14:49
Full comparison of McCarron and Golson.
-
baloo88
2013-03-01 03:37:54
50 percent of our passes were for less than 9 yards *
-
ACross
2013-03-01 12:01:17
As were 59% of Alabama's
-
manor98
2013-03-01 15:17:20
49.2 percent were 10 or more yards! (can play either way) *
-
LaughingTulkas
2013-03-01 15:16:13
that's pretty bad
-
tbonesays
2013-03-01 19:01:58
Average for the study was 63% *
-
dcorreal
2013-03-01 12:46:52
Misdiagnose?
-
ThreeD
2013-03-01 07:47:59
You may want to read the article
-
Irishaddict
2013-03-01 03:35:09
The contents of this post represent the views of the author. NDNation.com is not responsible for its contents.