to form a firm position... despite the fact that there are likely 3x that many points with any issue. Anyone who hasn't read 'thinking fast, thinking slow' should. I digress.
I'd say its 2 points here and everyone's off 'n running with some theory seeking validation, counting yays and nays and pronouncing some finding obvious because "these guys support me." Which is circular reasoning hell.
Couple of points:
The nutritionist has nothing to do with the combine. She supposedly left for more money. That's a commitment issue.
I have no idea what Motta means to S&C. I think we've done well there.
Alabama is kicking everyone's ass, any school that doesn't ask "should we do that"? Is playing for second place and will be pondering later "why didn't we do that"?
