not his predecessors. They're all 'fun facts' that you're presenting Sherm, but to me, it's all kind of a meaningless comparison. Others are free to believe otherwise, of course.
I'm much more interested in evaluating Kelly based on how he compares to the current crop of college football coaches. I'm not sure Kelly will compare all that favorably in such an evaluation. But I find it much more relevant than seeing how Kelly compares to coaches who were coaching when players still wore leather helmets.
My $0.02 for what they're worth. Otherwise, carry on.