I think 96 is a good size for top-level football.
by HowardRoark (2014-12-09 14:11:13)
[ cannot delete ]   [ Edit ]   [ Return to Rock's House ]   [ Show All Thread ]   [ Ignore Poster ]   [ Report Post ]   [ Highlight Poster ]   [ Reply ]

  In reply to: If they are geographically based....  posted by IrishFanIndy2003



64 is too few, and leaves us stranded, and anything much over 100 is too diluted.

I'm also assuming that our conference would be less geographic than some others, and that the old guard conferences would retain most of their cores (particularly the Big Ten and the SEC) while shedding their new arrivals.


Replies:

The contents of this post represent the views of the author. NDNation.com is not responsible for its contents.