I haven't looked at it. I thought it was odd that the few articles I read didn't cite the options extension as an argument in the Clemson case. I might have missed it, or the articles may have been poorly researched. The Clemson case seemed even more outrageous than the FSU case which at least has the option extension as a plausible argument.

The Clemson case is basically "we could do better on our own so we have the right to walk away".