well this is disturbing..(NSFW)
by abqgant (2012-12-19 21:42:53)
[ cannot delete ]   [ Edit ]   [ Return to Back Room ]   [ Show All Thread ]   [ Ignore Poster ]   [ Report Post ]   [ Highlight Poster ]   [ Reply ]

 



full story & video linked



Did she use the same gloves twice? *
by NDND  (2012-12-20 11:18:50)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


I thought the same thing. Appears she did. *
by MDDomer  (2012-12-20 11:41:20)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


Was it a cavity check or a cheek check - if the latter good
by 88_92WSND  (2012-12-20 10:35:51)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

reason for it -


Seriously -- that's some serious bedonkadonk to hide a pistol...

"The night was Thursday, August 1, 2002. Schmidt and Officer Tammy Friestleben, encountered Martha Donald, 60, at the Horn Terrace and Tower public housing complex in the Lyndale neighborhood in south Minneapolis. A member of Donald's family had placed a 911 call, expressing concern that she had a gun and was headed for home at Horn Terrace.

Donald allowed the officers to search her vehicle and pat her down. They found bullets in her purse but no weapon. Donald asked to use the restroom, and Schmidt and Friestleben escorted her to the first-floor restroom in Horn Terrace.

While Schmidt and Friestleben waited outside the stalls, Donald lunged from her stall, firing with a gun she'd concealed between her buttocks. Although Schmidt was wearing a bulletproof vest, she was shot in the abdomen below her vest. Officer Schmidt returned fire, fatally wounding Donald. Officer Schmidt then held her position until other officers arrived on the scene.
"


My favorite comment at the site with the story...
by kbyrnes  (2012-12-20 00:36:45)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

...says, basically, that this is a good example of why we mustn't let government take our guns: "We just seen a flash of the future if we let the Government ban guns. With no opposition, the Government will roll all over us and then what will we DO????"

We have to be able to blow away a cop who tries to strip search us, natch!


Everybody jump to conclusions time! *
by Colonel Mustard  (2012-12-19 23:49:11)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


I dunno dude...
by IrishApache  (2012-12-20 10:23:45)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

That did not seem kosher.

I'm racking my brain for scenarios where that would be permissible under the law, and I can't think of any.


I think the number of justifiable scenarios for that would
by MDDomer  (2012-12-20 11:42:42)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

be just about 0


Maybe he meant we can all jump to conclusions,
by tnirishfan  (2012-12-20 10:30:55)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

because the conclusion is easy to jump to?

What happens if she starts resisting the search? Does she end up with a resisting charge? I mean what is her option when this starts going down?


When who starts going down?
by Nitschke  (2012-12-20 10:58:31)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

That's where this leads. Right?


I don't really blame the policewoman that much.
by LocalSubAlum  (2012-12-20 11:31:27)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Just before going on duty, she had watched No Men Allowed Pt.4-Jailhouse Vixens.


Did you watch the whole video at the link? There doesn't *
by abqgant  (2012-12-20 00:02:18)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

appear to be any good reason for the officers to search these women in such a fashion.

Maybe that's just how they roll in Texas but I've never seen a police officer conduct a roadside cavity search for nothing more than a driver tossing a cigarette butt out of her window.


Roadside cavity search - sounds....poetic *
by mkovac  (2012-12-20 00:42:37)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


Roadside cavity search to the RHG. *
by LocalSubAlum  (2012-12-20 07:25:46)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


I thought only the TSA did that. *
by LocalSubAlum  (2012-12-19 23:02:46)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


I thought only Wooderson did that. *
by The Holtz Room  (2012-12-20 01:30:06)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post


I'll bet that's the last time you accept an invitation
by LocalSubAlum  (2012-12-20 07:50:16)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

to stay with him the next time you're in NYC.


The contents of this post represent the views of the author. NDNation.com is not responsible for its contents.