I guess I don't understand the question.
by captaineclectic (2013-07-23 16:40:13)
Edited on 2013-07-23 16:41:35
[ cannot delete ]   [ Edit ]   [ Return to Back Room ]   [ Show All Thread ]   [ Ignore Poster ]   [ Report Post ]   [ Highlight Poster ]   [ Reply ]

  In reply to: Which is different from any other job? *  posted by ndroman21

If the point is that rich privileged lawyers deserve to be unemployed and poor, then I guess I just don't agree.

If the point is that who cares if they're unemployed, because for awhile they made a lot of money so they should have plenty in savings, well, I can tell you there's a little truth to that. But that doesn't mean losing a job is a picnic.

If the point is that there is no problem, and people should keep taking out hundreds of thousands of dollars in non-dischargable loans to work in a collapsing industry, because if they do get a job with no stability it'll pay well for a short time, well, I disagree again.

If the point is "let's tee off on lawyers," proceed, but don't expect me to enjoy it.


The contents of this post represent the views of the author. NDNation.com is not responsible for its contents.