Legal question.
by ndmemphis (2013-07-23 14:05:08)
[ cannot delete ]   [ Edit ]   [ Return to Back Room ]   [ Show All Thread ]   [ Ignore Poster ]   [ Report Post ]   [ Highlight Poster ]   [ Reply ]

 



I own a fitness club in a retail shopping center and I'm currently behind on my rent. I pay every month, just not the full amount...business has been bad due to the opening of two new clubs within a mile of mine.

I found out today that the landlord has approved another "fitness" center to lease space in the same center. I own an Anytime Fitness, the club coming in is a UFC gym. The UFC gym specializes in classes, specifically kickboxing, but they do offer general aerobic classes. Also, according to the website they offer personal training which is my second largest revenue stream.

In my lease is the standard non-compete clause for only one fitness center in this complex.

My question is this: Does my being behind on rent give them the ability to skirt this clause? Does my past due rent mean that I originally broke my lease agreement and therefore have no room to argue?

Thanks.


Get an attorney quickly
by ndtnguy (click here to email the poster)  (2013-07-23 17:40:08)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

Your lease may or may not prohibit this, and your being behind may or may not let the landlord escape complying with restrictions that otherwise exist. What you want is to determine what your rights are, and assert them if appropriate, quickly.

Please feel free to e-mail me, I can refer you to someone in Memphis.


It depends what your lease says. Often an exclusive will
by 1978Irish  (2013-07-23 15:53:09)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

say something like "So long as Tenant is not in default under this lease and is operating as a ___________________. the Landlord will not lease space in the shopping center to a ____________." If it has this language then you could lose the exclusive by being in default. It would be best to try to negotiate a lease amendment to allow you to pay what you can and stay out of default.

Some exclusives don't have the qualifier about the default - it depends on what you negotiated. You need to read the lease closely with your lawyer. And without the default language, your being behind in your rent shouldn't allow the Landlord to breach (assuming it is a breach by the Landlord).

It depends on how they described the protection that you have as to whether the UFC gym is prohibited. If the Lease says the Landlord won't lease space to a "full service health club", then you have the question of fact as to whether a UFC gym is a "full service health".

Restrictions on use are often strictly construed, so if they can argue it is a different use, you could lose.

Again, it really depends on what the exact language of your lease says. You should get a good real estate attorney and read the lease carefully with him/her.


Don't waste time. Get a lawyer.
by Coachbob  (2013-07-23 15:52:10)     cannot delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

If you can prevent the other gym from opening you may have an easier time of it.

This is not legal advice, of course, just a suggestion.


Timeliness is always key in these types of cases...
by ndgenius  (2013-07-23 16:05:59)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

If the other store is allowed to open and you win the case, the landlord could owe them as well and it may impact your case. I'm not a lawyer but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night.


That you may be in breach
by sayahailmary  (2013-07-23 14:54:02)     Delete  |  Edit  |  Return to Board  |  Ignore Poster   |   Highlight Poster  |   Reply to Post

does not give the landlord an excuse to be in breach (assuming bringing the UFC gym in as a tenant violates the lease).


The contents of this post represent the views of the author. NDNation.com is not responsible for its contents.